Freischaltung

[Toom03]

und nur weil man ein gutes rating hat heist das noch lange nicht das man ansagen machen kann, als ich bei 100 punkte mal war hab ich trotzdem future rumgescheucht, weil der einfach ein richtig schlechtes Spiel hatte und dezent in panik war ^^

[_Arc]

played 2 games today with him and lost both, but individually he played well and justified his current rating,
felt he was weaker as pocket than flank but thats to be expected since he is a 1v1 player, any more decreases is too much imo, will probably get even better with TG experience.

[Iroh91]

The point is as I was introduced, the communication is a skill included in the rate. Since when you are giving points because of 1v1 rate? This is a kind of specialised teamgame rate where communication and decision making is different from voobly games. Furthermore Annor is saying I should give up my points at first to teach someone who has more points than me, what kind of arguing is this?

[nC_Ann0r]

1. Felix is probably 2200+ nC-rate in 1v1. So his actual rate (19xx) already includes his weaknesses in TGs.

2. When i rate players, i always try to include a bit of a projection towards the close future, when he is PROBABLY going to improve his TG skills quickly. i doubt, that he has very bad communication skills in general (like Slayer or Tiger ), he is just inexperienced.

3. I dont know exactly what u mean by

Annor is saying I should give up my points at first to teach someone who has more points than me, what kind of arguing is this?

Nobody told you to "teach" him. Just show a little bit more responsibility and proactivity when you talk about the team strat, game plan and unit choice. Btw: Thats NEVER a bad idea.

[Iroh91]

1. Felix is probably 2200+ nC-rate in 1v1. So his actual rate (19xx) already includes his weaknesses in TGs.

2. When i rate players, i always try to include a bit of a projection towards the close future, when he is PROBABLY going to improve his TG skills quickly. i doubt, that he has very bad communication skills in general (like Slayer or Tiger ), he is just inexperienced.

3. I dont know exactly what u mean by

Annor is saying I should give up my points at first to teach someone who has more points than me, what kind of arguing is this?

Nobody told you to "teach" him. Just show a little bit more responsibility and proactivity when you talk about the team strat, game plan and unit choice. Btw: Thats NEVER a bad idea.

I dont mean communication in per se
Just saying decisions are not on top
and macro seems to be weaker as mine as well so i dont see him as 2k and I know its contradict but many others so aswell

Is it my fault when he gets like 500 points to much rating?


@FelixAldi nothing personal

edit.: a player like slayer can compensate his weakness in teamgame with his playstyle thats why he is at this rating only

I can be wrong of course no doubt

[nC_Ann0r]

+500 nach längerer Zonenabstinenz. Hat richtig gelernt der junge.

[Pollux]

Hoffe Iroh segnet ab

[nC_PhilippHJS]

-200 nach einer Pause. Bitte wieder korrigieren, wenn er wieder spielt wie vorher.